Holacracy – An invitation for Your Opinion first
Brian Robertson, main author of Holacracy, outlines quite a clear view, when it comes to the status quo of today’s organizations. Following the introductions of his presentations, his statements seem appealing to many people, also to me. But when he adds his proposal for a solution, which is basically Holacracy, it finally doesn’t really catch me. It took me a few months to reflect on this from a theoretical as well as practical standpoint. Working myself since many years in the space of self-organization, a couple of things first did not sound right with Holacracy. Many people look curiously at the Zappos case, where for an outsider it is not easy derive real useful conclusions from. There are a couple of critical posts out there, some of them just critical, because they either do not understand this new way of thinking about organizations. Or some just try to be more clever, maybe because they have something to offer themselves. And their are very few negative reports from quite small companies, who stepped out again from Holacracy (like for example Medium).
However, some of these very few posts about real experiences, which are not just fancy speculation, sound like things had not been applied very well. Holacracy is a new concept how to organize a company without bosses. But as with every concept, you can apply it an a useful fashion, or you can just create nonsense with it. No single concept in the world will provide you from doing so. And the reason might also have to do with ones own background, especially when it comes to changing the way an organization shall work. Holacracy does not by any means tell about bureaucracy, and it does not at all prevent people having a lot of fun with each other at work (or also out of the office). But maybe the former organization had already a tendency to endless formalization and bureaucracy? Maybe people start feeling uncomfortable, when their former power role is simply not there anymore, and socializing apart from hierarchy was never their preference before?
There are also interesting positive reports about this concept. Take for example the story of Zappo’s former HR “boss”, Hollie Delaney, who tells a little bit about her story with Holacracy at Zappos and also about Zappos’ overall approach with culture, collaboration, happy people, including the Holacracy concept.
Lots of writing, little of it really based upon rich evidence, a lot of doubts about their approach and also positive insights. Last but not least my own experience, which goes just beyond having read a little bit and having an opinion. In this blog post I will elaborate more on my own current position from practice regarding Holacracy. But I want to turn the writing around a little bit. Instead of just offering my position and asking for feedback, I rather would like to hear a variety of positions first, before I will present my view.
What is your Opinion on Holacracy?
- Of course it is valid to ask, why would you go for Holacracy? What is attractive for you? And what would you expect out of it?
- On the other hand side, what challenges do you see?
And there are even some more interesting Questions?
- As a founder, leader of a business, what would make Holacracy interesting for you?
- As an employee of your company, why would you be interested in getting Holacracy on board?
I want to invite for your position, your thoughts around Holacracy. Just add your comments to this post. And I will add my insight very soon too.
Latest posts by Mike Leber (see all)
- Agile Experts in Wien - April 26, 2017
- Die Blockchain in der Digitalen Lunchbox – ein Veranstaltungsrückblick - March 16, 2017
- Digitale Lunchbox – Rückblende Session #3 - February 6, 2017